{"id":302,"date":"2025-06-03T14:11:36","date_gmt":"2025-06-03T12:11:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/?p=302"},"modified":"2025-06-03T14:11:36","modified_gmt":"2025-06-03T12:11:36","slug":"hruby-domaci-produkt-ekonomicky-ukazovatel-alebo-ideologicky-nastroj-moci-ako-sa-vedome-klame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/hruby-domaci-produkt-ekonomicky-ukazovatel-alebo-ideologicky-nastroj-moci-ako-sa-vedome-klame\/","title":{"rendered":"Hrub\u00fd dom\u00e1ci produkt: Ekonomick\u00fd ukazovate\u013e alebo ideologick\u00fd n\u00e1stroj moci? Ako sa vedome klame!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>\u010cas\u0165 2. &#8211; Ako zmenili v\u00fdpo\u010det ekonomiky aby z \u010ceskoslovenska spravili \u017eobr\u00e1kov ktor\u00fdch bolo treba preda\u0165 pre hospod\u00e1rsky rast.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>M\u00fdty o porovnan\u00ed \u010ceskoslovensk\u00e9ho \u010cNP a z\u00e1padn\u00e9ho HDP po revol\u00facii.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Po Ne\u017enej revol\u00facii v roku 1989 sa v \u010ceskoslovenskom verejnom priestore objavili mnoh\u00e9 porovnania ekonomickej \u00farovne \u010cSSR so z\u00e1padn\u00fdmi \u0161t\u00e1tmi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Politici, analytici i novin\u00e1ri a in\u00ed hlup\u00e1ci uv\u00e1dzali, \u017ee ekonomika \u010ceskoslovenska dosahovala len 30 % \u00farovne HDP kraj\u00edn ako Rak\u00fasko, SRN alebo USA. Tieto udalosti v\u0161ak vych\u00e1dzali zo z\u00e1merne chybn\u00e9ho a nespr\u00e1vneho v\u00fdpo\u010dtu kde sa porovnal \u010cist\u00fd n\u00e1rodn\u00fd produkt (\u010cNP), ktor\u00fd sa pou\u017e\u00edval v \u010cSSR, so z\u00e1padn\u00fdm hrub\u00fdm dom\u00e1cim produktom (HDP).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tak\u00e9to porovnanie viedlo k absurdn\u00e9mu a skreslen\u00e9mu v\u00fdsledku a samozrejme k umelo vytvoren\u00e9mu dojmu ako \u010ceskoslovensko na konci 80 rokov krachovalo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Je tu ale jedna d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e1 vec! \u010cNP a HDP nie je v\u00f4bec ten ist\u00fd v\u00fdpo\u010det a ani metodol\u00f3gia na porovn\u00e1vanie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HDP (Hrub\u00fd dom\u00e1ci produkt): Celkov\u00e1 hodnota v\u0161etk\u00fdch statkov a slu\u017eieb vyprodukovan\u00fdch v ekonomike za ur\u010dit\u00e9 obdobie. Zah\u0155\u0148a aj hodnotu opotrebenia kapit\u00e1lu (amortiz\u00e1ciu).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010cNP (\u010cist\u00fd n\u00e1rodn\u00fd produkt): HDP \u2013 amortiz\u00e1cia + saldo zahrani\u010dn\u00fdch pr\u00edjmov. Ide teda o \u201e\u010dist\u00fd v\u00fdnos\u201c ekonomiky po odr\u00e1tan\u00ed n\u00e1kladov na udr\u017eiavanie kapit\u00e1lu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V jednoduchosti: \u010cNP je v\u017edy ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed ako HDP. Porovnan\u00edm \u010cNP s HDP dostaneme v\u00fdsledky, ktor\u00e9 nadhodnocuj\u00fa rozdiel medzi dvoma ekonomikami.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pre\u010do \u010cSSR pou\u017e\u00edvalo pred rokom 1989 \u010cNP? V \u010ceskoslovensku, podobne ako v ostatn\u00fdch krajin\u00e1ch RVHP, sa v \u0161tatistike pou\u017e\u00edval predov\u0161etk\u00fdm \u010cNP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160t\u00e1t ako ekonomika v tom \u010dase potrebovala pozna\u0165 skuto\u010dn\u00fd re\u00e1lny ekonomick\u00fd pr\u00ednos po zoh\u013eadnen\u00ed amortiz\u00e1cie. \u010cNP sa preto v n\u00e1rodn\u00fdch \u00fatvaroch \u0161tatistiky pova\u017eoval za vhodnej\u0161\u00ed ukazovate\u013e ako HDP, ktor\u00fd zah\u0155\u0148a aj obnovovacie invest\u00edcie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pre\u010do z\u00e1pad pou\u017e\u00edva HDP? to sme si vysvetlili v prvej \u010dasti tohto mini seri\u00e1lu. Ale pribl\u00ed\u017eim to znovu v skratke. V z\u00e1padn\u00fdch ekonomik\u00e1ch sa uprednost\u0148oval HDP, ktor\u00fd ve\u013emi abstraktne ale &#8222;\u0161ikovne&#8220; vyjadruje ekonomick\u00fa aktivitu ako celok, bez oh\u013eadu na efekt\u00edvnos\u0165 \u010di reinvestovanie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A tu sme sa dostali do sporu medzi \u010cNP a HDP. Pr\u00e1ve tu prich\u00e1dza moment ke\u010f z \u010cSSR spravili papierov\u00fdch \u017eobr\u00e1kov.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Po revol\u00faci\u00ed do\u0161lo k z\u00e1mernej z\u00e1mene \u0161tatistiky \u010cSSR za\u010dali prezentova\u0165 v porovnan\u00ed so z\u00e1padn\u00fdmi \u0161t\u00e1tmi, ale bez prisp\u00f4sobenia metodiky v\u00fdpo\u010dtu ekonomiky. Konkr\u00e9tne sa porovnal \u010cNP na obyvate\u013ea v \u010cSSR s HDP na obyvate\u013ea v Rak\u00fasku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Akoby \u010cNP bolo HDP !!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Takto zmanipulovane sa vyvodili z toho z\u00e1very, \u017ee \u010ceskoslovensk\u00e1 ekonomika je len na &#8222;tretine&#8220; \u00farovne z\u00e1padu. Verejnos\u0165 tak bola oklaman\u00e1 aby politici mohli prija\u0165 opatrenia ktor\u00e9 od 90tych rokov dobre pozn\u00e1me. (privatiz\u00e1cia, rozkr\u00e1danie a podobne).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V skuto\u010dnosti, ak by sa porovnal HDP na obyvate\u013ea v parite k\u00fapnej sily, rozdiel by bol men\u0161\u00ed: cca 70\u201375 % \u00farovne Rak\u00faska v 80. rokoch. V niektor\u00fdch pr\u00edpadoch aj lep\u0161ie preto\u017ee \u010cNP nepo\u010d\u00edtalo s t\u00fdmito ukazovate\u013emi!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V \u010cNP (\u010cist\u00fd n\u00e1rodn\u00fd produkt) sa do v\u00fdpo\u010dtu \u010dasto nezapo\u010d\u00edtavali mnoh\u00e9 \u201eneprodukt\u00edvne\u201c sektory, najm\u00e4, slu\u017eby ako zdravotn\u00edctvo, \u0161kolstvo, verejn\u00e1 spr\u00e1va, kult\u00fara, administrat\u00edva, niektor\u00e9 \u010dasti obchodu a osobn\u00fdch slu\u017eieb (napr. kadern\u00edctva, pr\u00e1vne slu\u017eby), \u010dasto sa do v\u00fdsledn\u00fdch ukazovate\u013eov r\u00e1tali len \u201emateri\u00e1lne produk\u010dn\u00e9 odvetvia\u201c (priemysel, po\u013enohospod\u00e1rstvo, stavebn\u00edctvo).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tento pr\u00edstup vych\u00e1dzal z marxistickej ekonomickej te\u00f3rie, pod\u013ea ktorej iba v\u00fdroba hmotn\u00fdch statkov vytv\u00e1ra skuto\u010dn\u00fa pridan\u00fa hodnotu. Slu\u017eby sa pova\u017eovali za \u201espotrebn\u00e9\u201c alebo \u201eneprodukt\u00edvne\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Za\u010d\u00edna v\u00e1m svita\u0165?! Nieeee? tak e\u0161te raz. Dnes sa tieto slu\u017eby \u2013 neprodukt\u00edvne, preto\u017ee slu\u017eby s\u00fa v\u017edy neprodukt\u00edvne, zapo\u010d\u00edtavaj\u00fa ako neskuto\u010dn\u00e9 \u010d\u00edslo rastu v HDP, av\u0161ak aj za Socializmu sa slu\u017eby platili. Niektor\u00e9 hradil \u0161t\u00e1t in\u00e9 ste si hradili sami.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Teda \u010do sa stalo, z klob\u00faka sa vytiahlo dnes to, \u010do sa kedysi ako ukazovate\u013e nepou\u017e\u00edval a zrazu HDP r\u00e1stlo! Ale m\u00e1 to mal\u00fd ale dos\u0165 podstatn\u00fd h\u00e1\u010dik!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Naopak v HDP (Hrub\u00fd dom\u00e1ci produkt) \u2013 ako sa meria v trhov\u00fdch ekonomik\u00e1ch: v\u0161etky slu\u017eby sa r\u00e1taj\u00fa do HDP, bez oh\u013eadu na to, \u010di ide o s\u00fakromn\u00e9 alebo verejn\u00e9 slu\u017eby, zdravotn\u00edctvo, \u0161kolstvo, arm\u00e1da, bankovn\u00edctvo, poistenie, pr\u00e1vne slu\u017eby at\u010f. \u2013 v\u0161etko prispieva k HDP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To znamen\u00e1, \u017ee z\u00e1padn\u00fd HDP bol \u201enadhodnoten\u00fd\u201c aj preto, \u017ee zah\u0155\u0148al ve\u013ek\u00e9 segmenty ekonomiky, ktor\u00e9 v \u010d\u00edslach \u010cNP jednoducho neexistovali \u2013 nie preto, \u017ee by neexistovali v realite, ale preto, \u017ee sa do \u0161tatist\u00edk nezapo\u010d\u00edtavali.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ke\u010f si to zhrnieme, HDP bol vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed ako \u010cNP u\u017e len metodicky \u2013 kv\u00f4li zahrnutiu amortiz\u00e1cie a zahrani\u010dn\u00fdch pr\u00edjmov. Ale e\u0161te d\u00f4le\u017eitej\u0161ie je, \u017ee HDP obsahoval viac sektorov, a teda vykazoval vy\u0161\u0161iu absol\u00fatnu hodnotu aj kv\u00f4li tomu, \u010do sa do neho r\u00e1talo. Re\u00e1lne \u010dist\u00e1 hodnota z\u00e1padu bola mizern\u00e1!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Predstavme si krajinu, ktor\u00e1 m\u00e1:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-8cf370e7 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p>\u2022 100 mili\u00e1rd priemyselnej produkcie,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 30 mili\u00e1rd v zdravotn\u00edctve,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 20 mili\u00e1rd v \u0161kolstve,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 50 mili\u00e1rd v slu\u017eb\u00e1ch.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010cNP socialistick\u00e9ho typu by zapo\u010d\u00edtal len priemysel: 100 mili\u00e1rd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HDP kapitalistick\u00e9ho typu by zah\u0155\u0148al v\u0161etko: 200 mili\u00e1rd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ak by sa tieto dve \u010d\u00edsla porovnali priamo, vznikol by dojem, \u017ee socialistick\u00e1 krajina je len na 50 % v\u00fdkonu tej kapitalistickej, aj ke\u010f je to len ot\u00e1zka metodiky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A to sa udialo s porovnan\u00edm \u010cSSR a z\u00e1padom. Ako je zdevastovan\u00e9 \u010ceskoslovensko chudobn\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tieto skreslen\u00e9 udalosti mali siln\u00fd dopad pre spolo\u010dnos\u0165, ktor\u00e9 dnes ka\u017ed\u00fd poci\u0165uje alebo za\u010d\u00edna v\u00e1\u017ene poci\u0165ova\u0165.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Z\u00e1padn\u00ed &#8222;m\u00e1govia&#8220; posilnili narat\u00edv, \u017ee \u010ceskoslovensk\u00e1 ekonomika je &#8222;\u017ealostne zaostal\u00e1&#8220;. Prispeli k podporn\u00e9mu prostrediu pre \u0161okov\u00e9 reformy (kup\u00f3nov\u00e1 privatiz\u00e1cia, liberaliz\u00e1cia cien).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vytvorili v spolo\u010dnosti pocit menejcennosti vo\u010di z\u00e1padu, Zmenili optiku na vlastn\u00fa hist\u00f3riu: miesto hodnotenia funk\u010dn\u00fdch segmentov ekonomiky sa v\u0161etko hodilo do &#8222;ko\u0161a neefekt\u00edvnosti&#8220;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Porovnan\u00edm \u010cNP s HDP vznikol nepresn\u00fd obraz o stave \u010ceskoslovenskej ekonomiky po roku 1989. Tento obraz bol pou\u017eit\u00fd ako argument pre r\u00fdchle ekonomick\u00e9 reformy, ktor\u00e9 \u010dasto prebehli bez d\u00f4slednej anal\u00fdzy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dnes m\u00e1me povinnos\u0165 tieto m\u00fdty korigova\u0165 a analyzova\u0165 minulos\u0165 na z\u00e1klade presn\u00fdch metodologick\u00fdch porovnan\u00ed, aby sme lep\u0161ie porozumeli, \u010do sa skuto\u010dne od 90. rokov deje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Presn\u00e9 \u010d\u00edsla a metodika nie s\u00fa len \u0161tatistick\u00e1 technik\u00e1lia, ale maj\u00fa politick\u00fa silu formova\u0165 rozhodnutia a mienku celej spolo\u010dnosti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To \u010do sa deje dnes a rast HDP je obrovsk\u00fd podvod o ktorom budem p\u00edsa\u0165 v tretom vydan\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nku o HDP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ale napoviem v\u00e1m, aby ste mohli poprem\u00fd\u0161\u013ea\u0165. Zni\u010dili sme potravin\u00e1rsky priemysel, zni\u010dili sme po\u013enohospod\u00e1rstvo, hutn\u00edcky priemysel, bansk\u00fd priemysel, metalurgick\u00fd priemysel zni\u010dili sme siln\u00fd stroj\u00e1rensk\u00fd priemysel, zni\u010dili sme odevn\u00fd a chemick\u00fd priemysel a na\u0161e HDP rastie <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\ud83d\ude03\" src=\"https:\/\/static.xx.fbcdn.net\/images\/emoji.php\/v9\/t51\/1\/16\/1f603.png\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pre\u010do? pre p\u00e1r automobiliek? Smie\u0161ne, pre obchodn\u00e9 re\u0165azce a n\u00e1kupn\u00e9 stredisk\u00e1? Nie, nie! Zatia\u013e prem\u00fd\u0161\u013eajte a o tom bude \u010fal\u0161ia \u010das\u0165.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mysl\u00edte si \u017ee s\u00fa to kecy? Autor sa zbl\u00e1znil? Ale kde\u017ee! Ve\u013emi dobre pozn\u00e1m ekonomick\u00e9 te\u00f3rie a v\u00fdpo\u010dty, ale v tom celom brlohu \u010d\u00edsel mi nie\u010do ned\u00e1valo zmysel. K\u013eudne p\u00ed\u0161te koment\u00e1re o v\u00fdpo\u010dte HDP o tom ako je to v\u0161etko spr\u00e1vne a Slovensko to postav\u00ed na nohy. Stavia u\u017e 35 rokov a zatia\u013e tie nohy s\u00fa hlinen\u00e9 !<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u010cas\u0165 2. &#8211; Ako zmenili v\u00fdpo\u010det ekonomiky aby z \u010ceskoslovenska spravili \u017eobr\u00e1kov ktor\u00fdch bolo treba preda\u0165 pre hospod\u00e1rsky rast. M\u00fdty o porovnan\u00ed \u010ceskoslovensk\u00e9ho \u010cNP a z\u00e1padn\u00e9ho HDP po revol\u00facii. Po Ne\u017enej revol\u00facii v roku 1989 sa v \u010ceskoslovenskom verejnom priestore objavili mnoh\u00e9 porovnania ekonomickej \u00farovne \u010cSSR so z\u00e1padn\u00fdmi \u0161t\u00e1tmi. Politici, analytici i novin\u00e1ri a in\u00ed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-category-3"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=302"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":304,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302\/revisions\/304"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsvet.sk\/magazin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}